Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14897 (AP)

Cherukuri Lakshmi v. Secy., Revenue dept.

WP/1073/2018 · 2026-01-20

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010018622018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1073/2018 Between: 1. CHERUKURI LAKSHMI, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. COOLI, R/O.SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. BONIGI SRIRAMAMURTHI,, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC.COOLI, R/O. SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. KASIMKOTA APPALANARASAMMA,, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC.COOLI, R/O. SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. LAGUDU RAMANAMMA,, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC.COOLI, R/O. SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SECY REVENUE DEPT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 JS,J W.P.No.1073/2018 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents No. 3 in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their residential sites covered by possession certificate issued by the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Article 300-A of the Constitution on India and to consequently direct the respondent NO.3 not to interfere with residential sites of the petitioner in an extent of 60 Sq.yards each in Sy.N0.141 of Aganampudi Village, Visakhapatnam District covered by Possession Certificate NO.49817, 49813, 19816 and 49315 dated 14.11.2014 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to dispossess the petitioners from their residential sites admeasuring 60Sq.Yareds each in Sy.No.141 of Aganampudi village, Visakhapatman District covered by Possession Certificate Nos.49817, 49813, 19816 and 49315 dated 14.11.2014 pendig disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.1073/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “…..to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents No. 3 in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their residential sites covered by possession certificate issued by the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Article 300-A of the Constitution on India and to consequently direct the respondent NO.3 not to interfere with residential sites of the petitioner in an extent of 60 Sq.yards each in Sy.N0.141 of Aganampudi Village, Visakhapatnam District covered by Possession Certificate NO.49817, 49813, 19816 and 49315 dated 14.11.2014…” Heard both the learned counsel. During the course of hearing, learned counsel on both sides consented to dispose the writ petition by making interim order absolute. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is hereby disposed of and the interim order granted by this Court on 05.01.2018 is made absolute. However, the respondents are at liberty to follow the due procedure of law if any action is to be taken against the petitioners. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 21.01.2026 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.1073/2018 137 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1073/2018 Dated: 21.01.2026 RSD