Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010016492026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1026/2026 Between:
1. K KRISHNAMA NAIDU, S/O. LATE K. CHENGALRAYA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. BANDIVALLAVURU VILLAGE, MADHAVARAM POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. K. ANANDA NAIDU,, S/O. LATE K. VENKATASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. BANDIVALLAVURU VILLAGE, MADHAVARAM POST,YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. K. SRIRAMULU NAIDU,, S/O. LATE K. VENKATASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION,
R/O.
BANDIVALLAVURU VILLAGE, MADHAVARAM POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. K. JANAKIRAMA NAIDU,, S/O. LATE K. VENKATACHALAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION,
R/O.
BANDIVALLAVURU VILLAGE, MADHAVARAM POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR-517001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YADAMARRI POLICE STATION, YADAMARRI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517128. 4. K KODANDA NAIDU, S/O. LATE SESHAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. BANDIVALLAVURU VILLAGE, MADHAVARAM POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-
517128. 5. K CHITTIBABU, S/O. LATE SESHAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O. BANDIVALLAVURU VILLAGE, MADHAVARAM POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-
517128. 2
6. K VASUDEVA NAIDU, S/O. LATE K. VENKATACHALAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION,
R/O.
BANDIVALLAVURU VILLAGE, MADHAVARAM POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517128. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.3 in interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and unofficial Respondents and thereby threatening the Petitioner to enter into their fields to an extent of Ac.4.75 cents in Sy.No337/2 of Janagalapalli Village, Yadamarri Mandal, Chittoor District, is illegal, arbitrary, high-handed and a violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 and their staff not to interfere with the civil disputes in between the Petitioners and unofficial Respondents.”
2.
Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, inspite of pendency of civil suits between the parties with regard to the subject property, the Police are interfering in the civil disputes between them. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, as the matter is purely of civil nature, the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents. 3
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.01.2026 Dinesh
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.1026 of 2026
Dt.08.01.2026
Dinesh