Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14892 (RAJ)

MRS.MATHARA KUMAWAT DAUGHTER OF SHRI GOPAL KUMAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/19/2026 · 2026-01-09

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:917] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 19/2026 1. Mrs.mathara Kumawat Daughter of Shri Gopal Kumawat, Aged About 19 Years, Resident of Ward No.04. Char Bhuja Mandir Ke Pass, Khedi Deoliya Kalan, Bijainagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) Currently Residing At Khedi, Gurha Khurd, Bijainagar District Ajmer (Raj. 2. Mr. Mahaveer Son of Shri Sohan Kumawat, Aged About 26 Years, Resident of Resident Of Khedi, Gurha Khurd, Bi- jainagar District Ajmer (Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Superintendent of Police, Ajmer District Ajmer (Raj) 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer(Raj). 4. Shri Gopal Kumawat Son of Late Shri Mohann Kumawat, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Ward No.04. Char Bhuja Mandir Ke Pass, Khedi Deoliya Kalan, Bijainagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) 5. Ratan Lal S/o Shri Mohan Lal, Aged About 45 Years, Resi- dent of Ward No.04. Char Bhuja Mandir Ke Pass, Khedi Deoliya Kalan, Bijainagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:917] (2 of 2) [CRLW-19/2026] 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 and 5 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Ramganj on 23.10.2025. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.4 and 5 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer(Raj) and respondent No.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /333