Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14891 (KAR)

SMT. RAHAMATBI W/O MANSURSAB NIMBALKAR v. SMT. SAYIDABEGAUM W/O IBRAHIMSAB SIDDI

WP/111576/2017 · 2026-02-17

Lalitha Kanneganti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2412 WP No. 111576 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 111576 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. RAHAMATBI W/O MANSURSABNIMBALKAR, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: WARD NO.1, BAGALKOT-587102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SAYIDABEGAUM W/O IBRAHIMSABSIDDI AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: SECTOR NO.2, PLOT NO.E.18, NEAR MADINA MASJID AND NEAR SRI SATYASAI SCHOOL, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587102. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 07.04.2017 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BAGALKOT IN O.S. NO. 121/2016, PRELIMINARY ISSUE AT VIDE ANNEXURE –B. AS NULL AND VOID AND KINDLY ALLOW THE SAME IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS ARE DEEMED FIT AND NECESSARY UNDER THE CIRUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2026.02.18 10:45:08 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2412 WP No. 111576 of 2017 ORAL ORDER The Office has raised the objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition as the writ petition is filed questioning the rejection of the plaint. Hence, the memo is filed seeking to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to go before the appropriate forum. 2. When the Office has raised objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition in the year 2017, what the petitioner is doing, this Court is not able to understand. However, concerning the memo that is filed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, however, subject to the law of limitation. 3. All pending I.As. in this writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI RH CT: CNB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36