Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1489 (AP)

DEGA SURESH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11684/2026 · 2026-04-28

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010215342026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11684/2026 Between: 1. DEGA SURESH, S/O.ANJANEYULU , AGE. 45 YEARS ,14- 263,CHURCH STREET, EAST GUDUR,GUDUR,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.522238 2. THE GUDUR MUNICIPALITY, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER,NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.524101 3. THE GUDUR MUNICIPALITY, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (P.H), SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.524101 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Devasri Roshan K, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Ms. D. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Sri Gudapati Lakshminarayana, learned Standing Counsel for Gudur Municipality. 2. In compliance with the Order of this Court dated 28.04.2026, Sri A. Venkateswarlu, Commissioner, Gudur Municipality has appeared online. When this Court inquired whether there is any dispute with regard to the EMD & FSD, he would submit that there is no dispute. 3. Having regard to this statement, this Court is of the view that the EMD & FSD held by the Respondent is the money that belongs to the Writ Petitioner and the Respondent has no right to hold it at all. 4. In this view of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition, with a direction to the Respondents to return the EMD & FSD amount to the Writ Petitioner and to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra-departmental, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination, within a period of one (1) week from today and transfer the due amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within a week thereafter. 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit the bank account details to the Competent Authority within one week from today for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:29.04.2026 Vns