KAKARAPARTHI v. RAM PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/1475/2026 · 2026-01-19
D Ramesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14887 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14887 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
APHC010017742026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 1475/2026 Between:
1. KAKARAPARTHI VS RAM PRASAD, S/O. K SUBBA RAO, MALE, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS OCC RETD. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, APSHCL RIO. D. NO. 6-2-124/4, JAMMIBANDA ROAD KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM DISTRICT, TELANGANA - 507 001
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI -52239 2). 2. THE DIRECTORATE OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, NTR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR- 501506 3). 3. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT-520012 4). 2
4. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CFMS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER-522001 5). ::2::
5. THE AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, NIRMAAN BHAVAN, AUTO NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR-520012 6). 6. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD. NIRMAAN BHAVAN, AUTO NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-52001
7. THE DISTRICT HEAD HOUSING, AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD. KRISHNA DISTRICT-520012
...RESPONDENT(S):
::3::
This Court made the following ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents in non-payment of admitted amount of Rs. 19,88,070/- towards sanctioned 300 days of Earned Leave as per the proceedings of 5th Respondent in Procd. No. A1/2117/KRSH/2023 Dt. 18.12.2023 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to release the admitted amount of Rs. 19,88,070/- along with 7% interest towards sanctioned 300 days of Earned Leave to the Petitioner expeditiously or to pass….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. The present writ petition is filed for non-payment of admitted amount of Rs. 19,88,070/- towards 300 days of earned leave as per the proceedings of Respondent No.5 in Procd. No. A1/2117/KRSH/2023 Dt. 18.12.2023. 4. The Petitioner herein initially joined the service of the 5th Respondent on 01.02.1984 as a Supervisor.
The Petitioner thereafter retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation in the cadre of Deputy Executive Engineer, APSHCL, Jaggaiahpeta Sub-Division,
::4::
Krishna District (as it then stood), with effect from 28.02.2023, under the Revised Pay Scales, 2020. It is respectfully submitted that, as on the date of retirement, the 5th Respondent duly sanctioned leave salary equivalent to 300 days of Earned Leave, as per the rates and allowances applicable to the Petitioner, and issued proceedings in Proc. No. A1/2117/KRSH/2023 dated 18.12.2023, directing the 7th Respondent herein to draw and disburse the surrender leave amount equivalent to 300 days of Earned Leave, amounting to Rs.19,88,070/-, forthwith. Pursuant thereto, the 7th Respondent herein issued further proceedings in Rc. No. 863/A1/2022 dated 07.02.2024, directing the 3rd Respondent herein to disburse the said amount immediately. However, despite issuance of the aforesaid proceedings dated 18.12.2023 and 07.02.2024, and notwithstanding the lapse of nearly two years therefrom, the Respondents herein have failed and neglected to draw and disburse the said sanctioned amount in favour of the Petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition. 5. The learned Standing Counsel for A.P. Housing Corporation, on instructions, submits that the amount claimed by the Petitioner is not in dispute. The bills were also uploaded in CFMS portal and the payment would be made shortly. ::5::
6. In the light of the submissions made, as there is no dispute about the amount claimed by the Petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents to disburse the amount within a period of two (2) months from today. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Dt:20.01.2026 klk
::6::
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.1475 of 2026
Dt:20.01.2026 klk
182