SANJAY MAHESHWARI S/O SHRI RAMSWAROOP BIYANI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/62/2026 · 2026-01-28
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14885 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14885 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3965] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 62/2026 Sanjay Maheshwari S/o Shri Ramswaroop Biyani, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 229, Ayodhya Marg, Pratap Nagar, Khatipura, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur-302021 (Rajasthan). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ---Respondent
2. Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Sawai Singh, R/o SE 06, Sunder Nagar, Badrwas, P.S. Shyam Nagar, Jaipur City (South), (Rajasthan). ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Sahni, Adv., with Mr. Ram Mohan Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 28/01/2026
1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash criminal proceedings arising out of FIR No.567/2025 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) & 61(2) of BNS, 2023 on the basis of compromise.
2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. Learned counsel further submits that essentially, there is civil dispute between the parties and in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties, the entire payment has been made to the complainant/respondent No.2 by the petitioner. He further submits that there are no criminal
[2026:RJ-JP:3965] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-62/2026] antecedents against the petitioner. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless. The compromise-deed dated 16.01.2026 executed between the parties has been filed alongwith the application (1/2026) and the same is taken on record.
4.
Learned counsel for complainant submits that complainant has no objection if the present misc. petition is allowed.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.567/2025 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) along with consequential criminal proceedings arising out of it are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-407