Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14884 (KAR)

CHURACHAPPA S/O. PRACHANDAPPA BENNAPPANAVAR v. HESCOM

WP/103790/2014 · 2026-02-06

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1779 WP No. 103790 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 103790 OF 2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN: CHURACHAPPA S/O. PRACHANDAPPA BENNAPPANAVAR, AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYED, R/O. HALAKURKKI, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587206. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHURACHAPPA S/O. PRACHANDAPPA BENNAPPANAVAR, ABSENT) AND: 1. HESCOM HUBLI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY, DIVISION OFFICE, HUBLI, R/BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL O and M DIVISION, BAGALKOT-587102. 3. SHRI. MUTTEPPA SANGAPPA TEGGI AGE: 26 YERS, OCC: MICRO FEEDER FRANCHISE, AT POST: HALAKURKKI, R/O. TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHARMILA M.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; NOTICE TO R3 IS SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.02.2014 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G-VIDE.NO.KAR.SAM.BGK/KA.NIE(V)/LY/SALE/KAM/13-14/ 17694-98 AND ETC. GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.13 11:31:37 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1779 WP No. 103790 of 2014 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER 1. The court notice issued to the petitioner has been duly served. The name of the petitioner is indicated in the cause list. 2. The petitioner is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is of the year 2014. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. Hence, this Court has no other option than to dismiss the petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA gab Ct:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40