MRINMAY MANDAL S/O SHRI AKRUR MANDAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/337/2026 · 2026-01-12
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14883 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14883 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1051] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 337/2026 Mrinmay Mandal S/o Shri Akrur Mandal, Aged About 26 Years, R/ o Village Laxbagan, Post Pares Moni, District South 24 Praganas, Police Station Chotamola Khali, West Bengal. (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG, Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 12/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 166/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Commissionerate Jaipur, District Jaipur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 316(2), 111(2)(b), 61(2)(b) of BNS and Sections 66-C and 66-D of IT Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that similarly placed co-accused Bhairaram has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 18.12.2025. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2025 and the trial of the case
[2026:RJ-JP:1051] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-337/2026] may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that petitioner is involved in committing cyber fraud and mobiles were recovered from the petitioner, therefore the present bail application deserves to be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that similarly placed co-accused Bhairaram has been enlarged on bail and there are no criminal antecedents against the present petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mrinmay Mandal S/o Shri Akrur Mandal, in connection with FIR No. 166/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Commissionerate Jaipur, District Jaipur shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/16