Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14880 (AP)

DODDI PEDDA ANJINEYA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1497/2026 · 2026-02-02

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010017952026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 1497/2026 Between: 1. DODDI PEDDA ANJINEYA, S/O LATE D. SUNKANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 2. DODDI CHINNA ANJINEYA,, S/O LATE D. SUNKANNA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 3. MADDILETI DEVENDRA,, S/O LATE D. SUNKANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 4. MADDILETI NARASIMHULU,, S/O LATE D. SUNKANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, (ALL ARE R/O NAGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DIST.) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A P 522503 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. AP 515801 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. AP.515801 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 4th respondent in not issuing adangals and Form IB to the petitioners of the land in Sy. N0.257-H- 1 an extent of Ac.042 cents each situated at Nagasamudram village, Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur Dist. as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violation of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently issue the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 4th respondent to issue the adangals and Form IB to the petitioners of the land in Sy. No.257-H-l an extent of Ac.042 cents each situated at Nagasamudram village, Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur Dist. forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 3rd respondent in not issuing adangals and Form 1B to the petitioners of the land in Sy.No.257-H-1 to an extent of Ac.0.42 cents each situated at Nagasamudram Village, Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 31.01.2026 submits that it is a civil dispute over the land rights between their cousins on this registration gift deed. Therefore, the legal heirs of Maddiletigari Dodda Narasimhappa i.e., one Doddi Narayanaswamy and five others have filed a case against the present petitioners before the court of Junior Civil Judge, Guntakal vide O.S.No.190 of 2025. The disputed land to an extent of Ac.0.42 cents in the name of Naramma has been requested to be deleted from revenue records and the petitioners requested to mutate their names in the place of Naramma, w/o Pedda Sunkanna in the revenue records. If there are any objections on Webland Adangal entries, the present petitioners have the right to file ROR appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntakal to delete the entry of Naramma, W/o Pedda Sunkanna for an extent of Ac.0.45 cents of Nagasamudram Village. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and upon recording the written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 31.01.2026, the petitioners have to work out their remedies in accordance with law, if so advised. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 03.02.2026 PND