GIRRAJ PRASAD S/O SH. RAGHUNATH MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/6157/2026 · 2026-04-02
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13735-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6157/2026 Girraj Prasad S/o Sh. Raghunath Meena, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Village Ahir Ka Baas, Poonkhar, District Alwar-301414. (Occupation Self-Employed Farmer And A Citizen Concerned With Public Welfare) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005 (Raj.).
2. The Public Land Protection Cell, Through District Collector, Alwar, Collectorate, Alwar -301001 (Raj.).
3. Department Of Mines And Geology, Through Its Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005 (Raj.).
4. The Director, Mines And Safety, Directorate General Mines Safety, Ajmer Region, Ana Sagar Link Road, Ajmer- 305001 (Raj.).
5. The Mining Engineer, Khanij Bhawan, Hasan Khan Mewati Nagar, Alwar- 301001 (Raj.).
6. M/s Jhirkeshwar Mahadev Pvt. Ltd., Through Its Authorized Signatory Sh. Vijay Mangal, Delhi Alwar Road, Firozpur Jhirka, Nooh Mewat, Haryana- 122107.
7. Ashu Ram S/o Sh. Hemta Ram, R/o Village Mindawas, Tehsil- Bagora, District- Jalore- 343030 (Raj.).
8. Babu Lal Meena S/o Sh. Ghisaram Meena, R/o Paota Ka Baas, Barkhera, Dsirtict Alwar- 301406 (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Parihar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah
[2026:RJ-JP:13735-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-6157/2026] HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order 02/04/2026 Counsel for the petitioner submits that representation (Annex.5) of the petitioner is pending before the respondents. He submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if his representation is decided in accordance with law in a time bound programme. Mr. Vigyan Shah, learned AAG appearing for the respondent assures this Court that the representation of the petitioner shall be decided expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. In light of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition (Public Interest Litigation) is
disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the pending representation (Annex.5) of the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from today strictly in accordance with law. The stay application and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J AnilS/SanjayS18.