Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14879 (CAL)

MD TANVEER @ TANBIR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/344/2026 · 2026-03-27

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.03.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.40 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 344 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Eco Park Police Station Case No. 147 of 2025 dated 17.07.2025 under Sections 8/12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In Re : Md Tanveer @ Tanbir ... Petitioner. Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Mr. Manojit Debnath, Mr. Jyotirmoy Talukder ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Md. Adil Badr, Mr. Md. Kutubuddin ... For the State. Ms. Suveni Banerjee ... For the de facto complainant. (H. C. Legal Services Committee) Report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 17.07.2025 and since then, he is in custody. According to the learned advocate, charges have already been framed. As such, petitioner may be granted bail on any stringent condition. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State also opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. 2 Having regard to the period of detention of the present petitioner and the fact that on earlier two occasions, the victim did not appear before the Court on the date fixed for evidence, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Md Tanveer @ Tanbir shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Barasat, North 24- Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date so fixed by the learned Trial Court and shall not enter the jurisdiction of Eco Park Police Station until such condition is waived by the learned Trial Court. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 344 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)