Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14878 (GAU)

ARUP DAS v. THE UNION OF INDIA and 4 ORS

WP(C)/6613/2016 · 2026-09-21

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028732016 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6613/2016 ARUP DAS ROLL NO. 5105094792, S/O- KUMUD DAS, R/O VILL. and P.O.- ARARRA, DIST.- NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN- 781334. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 4 ORS REP. BY THE SECY., MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH SECY. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION BLOCK NO. 12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI- 110003. 3:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR NER STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION HOUSEFED COMPLEX WEST END BLOCK LAST GATE BELTOLA BASISTHA ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781006. 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE BLOCK NO. 10 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI Page No.# 2/3 PIN- 110003. 5:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL FORCE HEAD QUARTERS EAST BLOCK- V R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI PIN- 110066. 6:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG MEGHALAYA PIN-793011 7:THE PRESIDING OFFICER R.M.E. SSC RALLY-2015-2016 C/O-ASSAM RIFLES COMPOSITE HOSPITAL DIMAPUR SUKHOVI NAGALAND-79711 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.R MAZUMDAR, MS.R DUTTA,MRSP RAI,MR.H BEZBARUAH,MRU SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR.S K MEDHI, ASSTT.S.G.I.,,C.G.C., Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 22.09.2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. S. K. Medhi, learned counsel for the respondents is present for the respondents. It appears that on the last occasion, i.e., 29.01.2026 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on call. It further appears that the matter was accordingly dismissed by this Court by order dated 29.01.2026. However, upon restoration application, i.e, MC/07/2026 being filed, the matter has been restored to file by dated 14.08.2026. Shockingly, upon the matter being restored and listed before this Court, today, on the very first day, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant