15 - WP - 13000 - 2017.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13000 OF 2017 Satish Ramchandra Shinde Patil & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. The Union of India & Ors. … Respondents Adv. Rugwed Kinkar i/b Drupad Patil, for the petitioner. Mr. R. P. Kadam, AGP for the respondent – State. Adv. Shridhar Patil, for the respondent no.1. (Union of India) Adv. Aniruddha Karanjkar a/w Rutuja Kharat h/f Adv. Rakesh Singh, for the respondent 4. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 5, 2026 P.C.: 1. Ms. Rutuja Kharat, holding for Advocate Rakesh Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4-National Highways Authority of India has submitted that this petition has now become infructuous as the highway has been built on the subject land many years back. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the National Highways Authority of India, the present petition, which is seeking a relief for challenging the notification dated 2 December 2016 issued by the Road Transport and Highways Ministry of the Union of India under Section 3-A of the National Highways Act, 1956, has now become infructuous. Rushi 15 - WP - 13000 - 2017.docx 3. Hence, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Rushi