IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25866 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar S/o Belas Ram Resident of Mohalla- Bauliya, P.S.- Sasaram (Town), District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 468 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2), 111 of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, on getting secret information regarding cheating the passengers coming out from the Sasaram Railway Station by luring them into talks showing them duplicate gold jewellery and frightening them, police party reached there and apprehended two co-accused persons. From their possession clothes meant for changing and deceiving passengers and in a ladies purse wrapped in a paper two yellow duplicate rings were also recovered. The apprehended co- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25866 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 accused persons disclosed the name of petitioner and other co- accused persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Ajmal Akhtar and Jay Kumar. Except confessional statement, there is no material against the petitioner. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner was neither present at the place of occurrence nor he has concern with the other co- accused persons. It is further submitted that one case has been subsequently lodged against the petitioner. No victim has made any complaint. Only on the basis of suspicion, present case has been lodged. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and nature of allegation, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25866 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 468 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T