- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2383-DB CCC No. 100447 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CCC NO. 100447 OF 2025 ( CIVIL) BETWEEN: SMT. SANMATI W/O. RAVI KUTTE @ MALLEWADI, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: HOUSE NO. 231, SAI COLONY MAIN ROAD, OPP: OF SAI MANDIR, KANGRALI B. K., SHAHUNAGAR, BELAGAVI–590010. … COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. PRASHANT F. GOUDAR, SMT. ADITI P. GOUDAR, SMT. SHEETAL V. KILLERKAR, SMT. PALLAVI V. ARDHAMANE, SMT. PAVITRA PATIL & SRI. RUCHA ASHTAPURE, ADVS) AND: SHRI. RAVI H. KUTTE, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: WADA COMPOUND, OPP. ADINATH BHAVAN, ANGOL, BELAGAVI – 590 006. … ACCUSED (BY SRI. S.G. KULKARNI FOR SRI. DEEPAK S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF COURTS ACT 1971 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS PASSED IN W.P.NO.101012/2025 (GM-FC) DATED 30.06.2025 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE HON’BLE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AND ALSO AWARD COST OF THIS PROCEEDINGS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE & ETC., THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2383-DB CCC No. 100447 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) 1. The dispute pertains to the visitation rights granted in favour of the mother – complainant, while the custody of the child is with the father – accused. However, it is alleged that the accused has not complied with the orders passed by this Court. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant fairly submits that, subsequently, the order of this Court is being honoured by the accused. 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the contempt proceedings are hereby dismissed, reserving liberty to the complainant to initiate fresh contempt proceedings, if the accused fails to comply with the orders of this Court in future. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE VNP / CT: ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13