Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14866 (AP)

CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1516/2026 · 2026-01-19

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010017942026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 1516/2026 Between: 1. CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU, S/O @ HRIJANA CHINA SUBBARAYUDU @ BODEPPA, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,R/O NYAMADDALA VILLAGE, CENNEKOTHAPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT-515134. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM DIVISION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT-515671. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHENNAKOTHAPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT-515101. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 4th respondent in threatening to dispossess me from my lawful possession in respect of the land admeasuring ac. 4.75 cents in Sy.No. 652-1 situated at Nyamaddala village, Chennakothapalli Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District, without any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under the Statute, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to take any coercive steps without following the due process 2 of Law, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass orders directing the 4th respondent herein not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring ac. 4.75 cents in Sy.No. 652-1 situated at Nyamaddala village, Chennakothapalli Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District,, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JOSEPH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his lawful possession in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.4.75 cents in Sy.No.652-1 situated at Nyamaddala Village, Chennakothapalli Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District, without issuing any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under the Statute. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent submits that no action has been taken on the above subject land as no representation is received from anybody against the land as per the RSR GD(….) in Sy.No.652-1 to an extent of Ac.4.75 cents in Nyamaddala Village and no correspondence has been made by the 4th respondent with respect to the above subject land. 4. In view of the above said specific instructions of the 4th respondent, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 20.01.2026 SCH 4 89 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.1516 of 2026 Date: 20.01.2026 SCH