VIBHISHAN KUMAR ALIAS AADITYA VERMA ALIAS VIBHASAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1175/2026 · 2026-03-26
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14865 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14865 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:8713] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1175 of 2026
Vibhishan Kumar @ Aaditya Verma @ Vibhasan Kumar, Aged about 22 years, Son of Manoj Kumar Pajiyara, resident of Ghar Mal Rampur, P.O. Mal Rampur & P.S. Godda Town, District- Godda.
..... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Rishab Anand, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. N.K. Ganjhu, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 26.03.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rikhiya P.S. Case No. 159 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 351(2), 352, 324(2), 109(1), 111(4), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Deoghar.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of one Kundan Yadav, who has been apprehended. He next submits that the allegation of firing is not against this petitioner and in identical situation, the other co-accused has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail by this court in A.B.A. No. 1026 of 2026.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement.
5.
Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the
[2026:JHHC:8713] -2-
basis of confessional statement and the main allegation is against one Kundan Yadav and in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A, in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-26.03.2026 Amitesh/-