05.01.2026 Court No.28 Item No.93 tbsr Reject CRM (A) 4241 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Liluah P.S. Case No. 559 of 2025 dated 31.10.2025 under Sections 329(3)/115(2)/117(2)/109/303(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: XXXX ….Petitioner. Mr. Mritunjay Chatterjee Mrs. Suchismita Chakraborty Mr. Arka Roy ….for the petitioner. Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhuri ….for the de facto complainant. Ms. Sujata Das Ms. Suparna Chatterjee …..for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The victim’s mother and the petitioner are sisters. There was an ongoing dispute between the two. On 31.10.2025, the petitioner was allegedly assaulted by the husband of another sister and the father of the victim, and an FIR was lodged, which was registered after the present FIR. Reliance is placed on the injury report of the present petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the de facto complainant strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that there is a misstatement in the application. It has been wrongly stated that no application for anticipatory bail was filed before the learned Sessions Court. 2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. She relies on the statements of minor victim and the other witnesses including the independent neighoubrs. She also relies on the injury reports, which show infliction of serious injury on vital parts of the body like head that required stitches for repair and treatment at a hospital. Investigation is going on. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. With these observations, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)