Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14859 (BOM)

Bhagwan Dhondiram Dhumal v. Ranjit Singh Deol

CP/80/2026 · 2026-10-05

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12 - CP - 80 - 2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 80 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8392 OF 2012 Bhagwan Dhondiram Dhumal … Petitioner V/s. Ranjit Singh Deol … Respondent Adv. Sanjay Thokade (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Umakant Waghmare (through V.C.), for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Pawar, AGP for the respondent – State. Adv. Prasad Nagargoje (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Abhay Jadhavar for the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 5, 2026 P.C.: 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Educational Officer of Zilla Parishad, by its affidavit dated 14 July 2026 in paragraph No.11 has stated that as per the calculations of the Accounts Officer, the respondent-School has been directed to pay an amount of Rs.47,244/- towards pension and Rs.31,636/- towards retirement gratuity (DCRG). As per our order dated 28 September, 2026, the submission of the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4 to 6 was recorded that within a period of one week, the total amount of Rs.78,880/- would be handed over to the petitioner. Rushi 12 - CP - 80 - 2026.docx 3. Today, the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4 to 6 has handed over two cheques in the name of the petitioner for a total amount of Rs.78,880/-. The same has been duly accepted by the Advocate appearing for the petitioner. 4. In view of the same, the Contempt Petition is not pressed any further. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of as not pressed. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ) Rushi