Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14858 (RAJ)

SOORAJKARAN NUWAD S/O LATE SHRI SHYONARAYAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/89/2026 · 2026-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:948] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 89/2026 1. Soorajkaran Nuwad S/o Late Shri Shyonarayan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Jato Ka Mohalla, Village Chak Pinglod, Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). 2. Shyokaran S/o Late Shri Shyonarayan Nuwad, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Chak Pinglod, Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 143/2025 registered at Police Station Rupangarh, District Ajmer for offences u/S 115(2), 126(2), 329(4) & 189(2) of BNS. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the accused petitioners submits that the accused petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that none of the injuries sustained by the complainant has been opined to be dangerous to life. He further [2026:RJ-JP:948] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-89/2026] submits that the accused petitioners are in custody since 29.11.2025 and co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the court below. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the allegation against the accused petitioners is of serious nature. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner so also the fact none of the injuries sustained by the complainant has been opined to be dangerous to life and the accused petitioners are in custody since 29.11.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that they furnish personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /180