Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2034 CRL.P No. 104989 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.104989 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI ASHOK TANGADI AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.50/C, SARATHI COLONY, SAHYADRI NAGAR, DIST. BELAGAVI.
2.
SRI. SHAHIN SAYYAD W/O. ASHOK TANGADI, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KUVEMPU NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
3.
SRI. MUMTAZ SAYYAD AGE. 71 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KUVEMPU NAGAR, BELAGAVI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KISHOR SUTAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH APMC YARD PS, BELAGAVI, R/BY ADDITIONAL SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
2.
MRS. AMREEN VAJIDSHA SAYED AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. NILL, R/O. CRISTLE HEIGHT 5TH FLOOR, SADASHIV NAGAR, 7TH MAIN CROSS, BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. SHADAB H. YADAWAD AND N.S. BANKAPUR, ADVOCATES FOR R2)
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.12 16:54:56 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2034 CRL.P No. 104989 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023, SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND FIR DATED 21-06-2025 BEARING CRIME NO.0072/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 115 (2), 329 (4), 75, 324(4), 308(2), 351(1), 352, 3(5) OF BNS, 2023 AND U/S 8 OF POCSO ACT, 2012 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 I.E., APMC YARD POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI CITY AGAINST THE PETITIONERS WHO ARE ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NOS 1 TO 3, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
"The memo on behalf of the petitioners is as under: That, in view of the charge sheet been filed by the State, the petitioners seek liberty of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the above petition and also grant liberty to challenge the charge sheet. Hence this memo.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 74