Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8616
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 786 of 2026
--------- Om Shanti Kumar, aged about 26 years, Son of Late Rajendra Pandit, Resident of House No.258, Abhimanyu Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Chas, District-Bokaro.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner
: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, A.P.P.
--------- 03/Dated:-26.03.2026
1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Sector-IV P.S. Case No.120 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 15.12.2025; as such, he may be released on bail.
4.
Learned A.P.P vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation made against the petitioner and the stage of trial, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail at this stage; however, petitioner may renew its bail application after three months.
6.
Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) MARCH 26, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 30.03.2026