Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14856 (CHH)

VIVEK KUMAR KAUSHIK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/3532/2026 · 2026-04-19

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17945 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3532 of 2026 Vivek Kumar Kaushik S/o Shatrughna Prasad Kaushik Aged About 41 Years Aged About 21 Years, R/o Wared No. 12, Sarvodaya Nagar, Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station - Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohishek Verma, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State For Objector : : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. G.A. Mr. Vijay Kumar Sahu Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 20.04.2026 1. This is the Second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 114 of 2025 registered at Police Station – Pali, District Korba (C.G.) under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 61(2)(a) of VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2026.04.22 15:42:52 +0530 2 the BNS and 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. 2. The earlier bail application of the applicant has been rejected on merits by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 22.07.2025 passed in MCRC No. 5720 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application may be dismissed as withdrawn, as several defects have been pointed out by the Registry and the same have not been cured. It is further submitted that, as per the rules of the Court, the bail application was required to be filed within the stipulated time in accordance with the rules of the C.G. High Court; however, the defects have not been cured within the prescribed period. Hence, he prays for withdrawal of the present bail application with liberty to file a fresh one. It has also been pointed out that an SLP was filed against the order passed by this Court in MCRC No. 5720 of 2025 dated 22.07.2025, and the said SLP, bearing No.13573 of 2025, was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 15.09.2025. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh and take recourse to law as and when occasion arises, if so advised. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav