MAHADEO BALKU BHOSALE v. USHATAI PRAKASH MAHADIK and ORS.
FA/1417/2002 · 2026-10-06
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14855 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14855 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1/3 13-FA-1417-2002 (C).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1417 OF 2002 Mahadeo Balku Bhosale …........Appellant VERSUS Ushatai Prakash Mahadik And Ors. ….......Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 2437 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1417 OF 2002 Mahadeo Balku Bhosale …........Applicant VERSUS Ushatai Prakash Mahadik And Ors. ….......Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 3375 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1417 OF 2002 Mahadeo Balku Bhosale …........Applicant VERSUS Ushatai Prakash Mahadik And Ors. ….......Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Gargi Warunjikar (Through VC), for Appellant/Applicant. Mr. Parth Pitambare i/b Mr. Umesh Mankapure, for Respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5. Ms. Varsha Chavan, for Respondent No.10 – United India Insurance Co. Ltd. _________________________________________________________________ Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.10.06 20:32:20 +0530
2/3 13-FA-1417-2002 (C).DOC
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 6th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C.
1. This Appeal is of the year 2002.
2. By the present Appeal, the Appellant, i.e. Original Opponent No.3 in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.162 of 1992, has assailed the
judgment and award dated 3rd July 2001.
3. Mr. Parth Pitambare, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 (Original Claimants), states that the subject matter of this Appeal is settled. He tenders a photostat copy of the order dated 5th August 2008 passed by the learned District Judge-2 and Member, M.A.C.T., Sangli, in M.A.C.P. Darkhast No.19 of 2002. The same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification, which reads thus:
“ Order below Exh. 1 in MACP Darkhast No.19 of 2002 (Usha Prakash Mahadik Vs. Mahadeo Balku Bhosale). Read pursis Exh.38. The D.H. does not want to proceed with the Darkhast. Therefore, O R D E R The Darkhast stands disposed off as fully satisfied. No costs.” Shantanu S. Dhudum
3/3 13-FA-1417-2002 (C).DOC
4. Ms. Gargi Varunjikar, learned Advocate for the Appellant, states that, in view of the order dated 5th August 2008 produced by Mr. Parth Pitambare, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5, nothing survives in the Appeal and this Appeal be disposed of.
5. In view of the above, First Appeal No.1417 of 2002 is disposed of.
6. In view of the disposal of the First Appeal, all pending Interim Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum