Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14854 (RAJ)

LADURAM TAILOR SON OF GOPI LAL TAILOR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/54/2026 · 2026-01-20

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2395] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 54/2026 Laduram Tailor Son Of Gopi Lal Tailor, Aged About 54 Years, Occupation Service In Postal Department, R/o Jaliya Second Police Station Bijaynagar, District Beawar. (Presently Lodged At District Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 20/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.363/2025 registered with the Police Station Vijay Nagar, District Beawar for offence under Section 316(5) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that while he was holding the post of Dakpal (Postmaster), there was some shortage of amount of Rs.96,000/- and he is said to have misappropriated the said amount. Learned counsel further submits that after notice of the Department, the petitioner has already deposited the said amount and has been placed under suspension. He further submits that after depositing the said amount and suspension of the petitioner, the present criminal case has been lodged by the Department against him. He further submits that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the [2026:RJ-JP:2395] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-54/2026] matter and the petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2025, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, and more particularly the fact that the amount, which was found to be short, has already been deposited by the petitioner and the police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and he is in custody since 16.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /150