Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14852 (KAR)

IMRAN MAHEBUBALI PANWALE S/O MEHABOOBALI PANAVALE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/100153/2026 · 2026-02-06

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1781 CRL.P No. 100153 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.100153 OF 2026 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. IMRAN MAHEBUBALI PANWALE S/O MEHABOOBALI PANAVALE (IN FIR THE NAME IS MENTIONED AS IMRAN MEHABOOBALI PANVALE) AGE 36 YEARS OCC. LABOURER R/O. KASTURBA NAGAR SIRSI TQ SIRSI DIST UTTAR KANNADA 581402. 2. RIYAZ AHMAD S/O HUSEN SAB (IN FIR THE NAME IS MENTIONED AS RIYAZ HIREHALLI) AGE 44 YEARS OCC. LABOURER R/O. KASTURBA NAGAR SIRSI TQ SIRSI DIST UTTAR KANNADA 581402. 3. MOHAMMED JAFAR ALLABAKSH HANGAL S/O ALLABAKSH HANGAL (IN FIR THE NAME IS MENTIONED AS MOHAMAD JAFAR ALABKSHA HANGAL) AGE 36 YEARS OCC. LABOURER, R/O KASTURBA NAGAR SIRSI , TQ SIRSI DIST UTTAR KANNADA 581402. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANNESAHEB SHALAGAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SIRSI NEW MARKET POLICE STATION, R/BY HCGP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENCH, AT DHARWAD 580011. 2. NOORAHEMAD KANAVALLI S/O MAQBULL AHEMAD KANAVALLI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.11 15:04:03 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1781 CRL.P No. 100153 of 2026 AGE 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMAN R/O KASTURBA NAGAR SIRSI, DIST UTTARA KANNADA 581402. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. S.B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023 SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT, FIR AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ARISING OUT OF SIRSI NEW MARKET PS CRIME NO. 127/2025 REGISTER FOR THE ALLEGED NON CONGNIZABLE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIOIN 351(2) OF BNS 2023 PENDING BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDITIONAL JMFC SIRSI IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS (ACCUSED NO 2 TO 4 ) ARE CONCERNED AND CONSEQUENTLY SEEKING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24.10.2025 PASSED BY PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL JMFC SIRSI IN SIRSI NEW MARKET PS NC NO. 38/2025 WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL JMFC SIRSI VIDE DOCUMENT NO. 3 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS /ACCUSED NO. 2 TO 4 ARE CONCERNED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Joint memo is filed. Parties present. 2. On enquiry with the parties, they submit that the dispute among them resolved amicably. 3. At the spur of the moment the incident has occurred and since true settlement has been arrived, parties agree that pending criminal proceeding be closed. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1781 CRL.P No. 100153 of 2026 4. In view of the true settlement among the parties, following the principles of law enunciated in the case of Ramgopal and another vs State of Madhya Pradesh reported in (2022)14 SCC 531 and also taking note of the fact that lis is privy to the parties and had no social impact, placing the joint memo on record, the following: ORDER (i) Criminal Petition is allowed. (ii) Consequently, pending proceedings in Crime No.127/2025 and N.C.No.38/2025 registered by Sirsi New Market Police Station stand quashed. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm Ct-cmu list no.: 1 sl no.: 100.2