SONU SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
WRIA/13737/2026 · 2026-10-05
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14849 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14849 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13737 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Mr. K. Shahi, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"(i) To call for the records and to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents/Commission to correctness of re-examine/re-check the Answer of Question Nos.30 of petitioner no.1 and also Answer of Question Nos. 102 of petitioner no.2 of the abovementioned Question Booklet Series in the Model Answer Key regarding Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) Exmination-2022 in Hindi subject in accordance with law. ( ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to properly evaluate and provide marks to the petitioners on the Question Nos.30 and 102 in accordance with law. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioners regarding re-checking the correctness of Answer of Question Nos.30 and 102 in the Model Answer Key regarding TGT Examination-2022 in Hindi subject and it may be properly re- checked by the Experts of Hindi subject and for providing proper marks to the petitioners in accordance with law. (iv) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (v) Award the cost of this writ petition to the petitioners."
3. The issue in question has already been settled by the Lucknow Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 28.09.2026 passed in Writ-A No.8055 of 2026 (Seema Gupta And 20 Others vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others). Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi Sonu Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another .....Respondent(s)
4. 4. Considering the fact that a decision has already been taken by the respondent authorities with respect to Question Nos.30 and 102 of the Hindi question paper of the T.G.T. Examination (Adv. No.01/2022). The respondent authorities may take a decision and proceed with the declaration of result accordingly. 5.
In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of, accordingly. October 6, 2026 K.N.
WRIA No. 13737 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad