Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14848 (BOM)

JAMSHID DASTGIR JAMADAR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/2737/2023 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31 - ABA - 2737 - 2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2737 OF 2023 Jamshid Dastgir Jamadar & Anr. … Applicants Versus. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Anand S. Patil with Mr. Soham Powar and Mr. Pratik B. B. for the Applicants. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State. Mr. Dhananjay A. Utture i/by Mr. Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar for the Intervenor-Respondent No.3. ------- CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATED : OCTOBER 5, 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Anand S. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the State. 2. On 29th September 2023, the following order was passed: “1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.No.154 of 2023 registered with Ajara Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Mr. Arjunwadkar submits that that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the Intervener and seeks leave to file an Intervention application. 4. Leave granted. VRJ 1 VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed by VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2026.10.06 10:37:23 +0530 31 - ABA - 2737 - 2023.doc 5. Intervention application may be filed within a period of one week and copy served on the Applicant and the State. 6. The learned APP seeks time to take instructions as the Investigating Officer is not present. 7. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was on interim bail till the date of the rejection of the application by the Court of Session. Even thereafter, the Additional Sessions Judge had continued the interim protection till 22 September 2023. 8. In view of the above, at the request of the learned APP, stand over to 11 October 2023. 9. Interim protection granted by the Court of Session, which was in operation till 22 September 2023, shall continue to operate till the next date.” 3. On 23rd September 2026, the following order was passed: “1. This Anticipatory Bail Application is of the year 2023. By order dated 29th September 2023, the Applicants were granted ad-interim bail. 2. Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the State, submits that the presence of Applicant No. 1 (Jamshid Dastgir Jamadar) is required by the Investigating Officer, Ajara Police Station, District Kolhapur. Mr. Anand S. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicants, states that Applicant No. 1 will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required by the Investigating Officer, Ajara Police Station, District Kolhapur. 3. Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the State, submits that the presence of Applicant No. 1 is required on 24th , 28th , 29th , 30th September 2026 and 1st October 2026 from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. 4. Mr. Anand S. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions from the Applicants, states that Applicant No. 1 shall appear on all the said dates at the time as stated by Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the State. 5. Mr. Anand S. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicants, and Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP, request for listing of this matter on 5 th October 2026. 6. At the request of Mr. Anand S. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicants, and Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP, list this Application on 5th October 2026 under the caption "Prioritized Cases", this Application VRJ 2 31 - ABA - 2737 - 2023.doc being of the year 2023. 7. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.” 4. Mr. Anand S. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicants, states that the Applicants have appeared before the Investigating Officer and have cooperated with the investigation in Crime No. 154 of 2023 registered at Ajara Police Station, Kolhapur. He further states that the Applicants shall continue to cooperate and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required. 5. Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer investigating Crime No. 154 of 2023, states that the Applicants have appeared before the Investigating Officer and have cooperated with the investigation in Crime No. 154 of 2023. He on instructions from the Investigating Officer, states that the custodial interrogation of the Applicants is not required in Crime No. 154 of 2023. 6. Based on the statement made by Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the State, that the custodial interrogation of the Applicants is not required in Crime No. 154 of 2023, Mr. Anand S. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicants, states that the apprehension of the Applicants stands allayed and that this Application be disposed of. Statement made by the Investigating Officer investigating Crime No. 154 of 2023 is taken on record. VRJ 3 31 - ABA - 2737 - 2023.doc 7. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2737 of 2023 is disposed . (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) VRJ 4