Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14845 (PAT)

Shyam Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./30097/2026 · 2026-05-11

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30097 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2025 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Shyam Yadav S/O Late Rajendra Yadav Resident Of Village- Ranipur, P.S- Kako (Bhelawar O.P), Distt.- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 155(2), 188(1), 109(1), 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3 (5) of BNS. 3. As per F.I.R. on 07.12.2025 about 09:00 A.M. when informant along with tractor loaded with paddy crops was crossing from the field of one Rajkumar Sharma, in the meantime, this petitioner, namely, Shyam Yadav, co-accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30097 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/3 Dhananjay Kumar, wife of this petitioner Shyam Yadav equipped with lathi, danda stopped his tractor and abused him and not allowed to cross through his field. Thereafter, co- accused Dhananjay Kumar gave farsa blow, as a result of which his head got fractured and blood started oozing and at the same time this petitioner assaulted him with lathi, as a result his right hand got fractured and wife of Shyam Yadav also assaulted him. It is further alleged that this petitioner Shyam Yadav snatched gold chain of worth Rs 90,000/- from his neck. Upon hulla, people of vicinity gathered and this petitioner along with other accused persons fled away after taking cash of Rs 1,975/- from his pocket and also threatened him with dire consequences. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus against this petitioner. The present case is counter case of Kako (Bhelawar- O.P.) P.S. case no. 459 of 2025 which was lodged by petitioner against informant and others. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he along with other co-accused persons assaulted informant and injury caused by this petitioner is grievous in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30097 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 3/3 nature . 6. Considering the nature of accusation , injury and other circumstances of case, prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected. Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T