Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14845 (BOM)

SUJEET ASHOK BARGE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT. AND ORS.

IA/1565/2026 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

40-WP-2055-2026(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2055 OF 2026 Sujeet Ashok Barge ...Petitioner The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1565 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2055 OF 2026 Sujeet Ashok Barge ...Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Sujeet Ashok Barge ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents —————— Mr. Gurubala Birajdar for the Petitioner/Applicant. Mr. Vikas M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Sandeep Dere, for Respondent No.3. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : October 05, 2026. P. C. : INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1565 OF 2026 : 1. Interim Application has been preferred seeking amendment of the Petition in order to place on record the entire reasoned order. The Jamadar - SL 1 of 2 2026:BHC-KOL:9548-DB 40-WP-2055-2026(C).doc Petition came to be filed by annexing only the operative order which was available at that time. 2. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 submits that, by reason of an interim order operating in favour of the Petitioner, Respondent No.3 is gravely prejudiced. 3. Considering the amendment, the same is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith, as per Schedule-I. Re-verification is dispensed with. 4. Interim Application is allowed. WRIT PETITION NO. 2055 OF 2026 : 5. Stand over to 14th October, 2026, under the caption for “Circulation”. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Jamadar - SL 2 of 2