RISHI RANJAN ALIAS RISHI RYAN ALLIAS RRESHI RANJAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10105/2025 · 2026-02-16
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14843 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14843 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:4304 )
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10105 of 2025
Rishi Ranjan @ Rishi Ryan, @Rishi Ranjan Kumar, aged about 24 years son of Pawan Kumar Yadav, R/O vill. Narhi Pakaria P.O. & P.S. Kunda Sub-Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand.
… … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
--- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
---
For the Petitioner : Ms. Vidhika Saboo, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, APP
03/16.02.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2025 in connection with Kunda P.S. Case No. 203 of 2024, registered under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1),140(2),3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and section 25(9) Arms Act, Amendment 2019, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Deoghar.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no linkage of petitioner’s mobile for any ransom call. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-state has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the petitioner has been identified by the victim and the petitioner along with other miscreants had kidnapped the informant for ransom. It is also submitted that the petitioner has six criminal antecedents of similar nature.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has been identified by the victim and he has
( 2026:JHHC:4304 )
2
numerous criminal antecedents, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above named on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
5. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 16.02.2026 Uploaded on 17.02.2026 Binit/