Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14843 (ALL)

CHAND BABU v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/35279/2026 · 2026-10-05

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35279 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. As informed by learned A.G.A., notice to the informant has been served on 19.9.2026. 2. Heard Sri Shobhit Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 184 of 2025, under Sections 65(2), 352 BNS and 5M/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Tindwari, District Banda, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that the victim has been examined as P.W.-3 and she has completely resiled from her earlier statement given to the Investigating Officer and the allegations of the FIR; that the witness has been cross-examined by the public prosecutor after declaring her hostile and as such, there being no likelihood of conviction of applicant in the present case under the circumstances; that the applicant has no criminal antecedents to his credit and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Chand Babu, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to verification of sureties, with the condition that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any of the above condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observation herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 6, 2026 Shalini Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhand Pratap Singh, Shobhit Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chand Babu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad