SURAJ JOSHI URF BADSHAH S/O LATE SHRI LEELADHAR JOSHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/100/2026 · 2026-01-28
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14838 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14838 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3751] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 100/2026 Suraj Joshi Urf Badshah S/o Late Shri Leeladhar Joshi, R/o Kasba Haldwani Lamba Chorad Near Chardham Mandir, Padli- Plot No. -2, Police Station Mukhani District Nainital Uttrakhand Hal Khanabdos Nandpuri Samsanghat Malviya Nagar Police Station Malviya Nagar Jaipur At Present Confined Central Jail Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 28/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.635/2025, registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2025, charge-sheet has already been submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the petitioner is a habitual
[2026:RJ-JP:3751] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-100/2026] offender and against him 15 cases are registered, therefore, considering the gravity of offence and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the bail application may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Suraj Joshi Urf Badshah S/o Late Shri Leeladhar Joshi, in connection with FIR No.635/2025, registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is
directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the
[2026:RJ-JP:3751] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-100/2026] aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court.
9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-84