Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14837 (KAR)

ARJUNA S/O BHIMAPPA DUGNAVANAR, v. GRAM PANCHAYAT OFFICE WADDERHATTI

WP/101051/2026 · 2026-02-19

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2567 WP No. 101051 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 101051 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: ARJUNA S/O BHIMAPPA DUGNAVANAR, AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. WADDAHATTI, MUDALAGI, DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591224. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARAD M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: GRAM PANCHAYAT OFFICE WADDERHATTI, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, TAL. MUDALAGI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591224. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, I) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 31.12.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-E OF THE PETITIONER AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY THE PETITIONER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; II) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO WHICH THE PETITIONER IS FOUND ENTITLED TO IN THE PRESENT FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2567 WP No. 101051 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “i) issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 31.12.2025 vide ANNEXURE-E of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders and direct the respondent to provide the information sought by the petitioner in the interest of justice and equity; ii) issue any other writ, order or direction to which the petitioner is found entitled to in the present facts and circumstances.” 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has approached the respondent under the Right to Information Act and sought for certain information. It is his grievance that the said information is not furnished and the representation is not considered. Hence he has come before this Court by filing the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the material on record. When an application is filed under the Right to Information Act, if the information is not granted within the time bound manner, there is a remedy - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2567 WP No. 101051 of 2026 available to the petitioner. He cannot come before this Court seeking a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, this Court is passing the following: ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available to him under the Act. ii. All I.As in this writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI BVV CT: CNB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15