115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRWP-2826-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.03.2026 Sunil Kumar ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and Others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Rahul Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of direction to the official respondents to to consider and take action on the representation/complaint dated 15.01.2026 (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has filed representation dated 15.01.2026 to respondent No.2, however, no action has been taken thereon till date. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Sahil Chowhdary, AAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 15.01.2026 (Annexures P-1) qua the threat perception filed by the petitioner in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.13 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2826-2026 (O&M) -2- and to grant immediate protection, if any threat to the life and liberty to the petitioner, is perceived. It is being clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner for legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. 6. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. March 13, 2026 (MANDEEP PANNU) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.13 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document