Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14826 (RAJ)

OMPRAKASH ALIAS LALA S/O BHANWARLAL ALIAS MEHBUB v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/83/2026 · 2026-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:723] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 82/2026 Rajesh S/o Laxman @ Totaram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bawariya Ki Dhani, Haripura, Police Station Narena, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 83/2026 Omprakash Alias Lala S/o Bhanwarlal Alias Mehbub, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Baawriyo Ki Dhani, Haripura, Police Station Narena, District Jaipur Rural. At Present Judicial Custody In Sub Jail, Sambharlake. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pareek Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.186/2025 registered at Police Station Phulera, Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. [2026:RJ-JP:723] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-82/2026] 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. As per the submissions made by counsel for the accused- petitioners, they have falsely been implicated in this case and no recovery has been effected from them. It is also submitted that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 15.12.2025 and they are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. It is also submitted that the offences as alleged against the accused- petitioners are triable by the Court of Magistrate. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners and so also the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 15.12.2025 and the offences alleged against them are triable by the Court of Magistrate, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /186-187