GHANSHYAM PANDEY @ VINAY KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./851/2026 · 2026-02-16
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14826 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14826 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:4240 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 851 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 851 of 2026
1. Ghanshyam Pandey @ Vinay Kumar Pandey, aged about 34 years, son of Late Balgovind Pandey, resident of Village- Malda Pandeydih, P.O. & P.S. Gawan, District- Giridih
2. Ghotilal Pandey @ Mithilesh Kumar Pandey, aged about 31 years, son of Late Balgovind Pandey, resident of Village- Malda Pandeydih, P.O. & P.S. Gawan, District- Giridih
3. Malo Devi @ Maya Devi, aged about 75 years, wife of Late Balgovind Pandey, resident of Village- Malda Pandeydih, P.O. & P.S. Gawan, District- Giridih
… Petitioners
-Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Dashrath Pandey, age 60 years, S/o Vishwanath Pandey, R/o Village- Batpur, P.O. Simariya, P.S. Chakai, District- Jamui, State- Bihar
… Opposite Parties
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P.
-----
02/16.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1766/2008, registered for the offence under Sections 304B, 201, 498A, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are brothers-in-law and petitioner no.3 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. He further submits that the case has been lodged against the petitioners and others by way of filing complaint petition alleging therein that the petitioners have killed the deceased by sprinkling kerosene oil and put her on fire. He then submits that the learned Court has called for a report from the police and the inquiry report has been made available by the police
( 2026:JHHC:4240 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 851 of 2026
and in that report, it has been disclosed that on inquiry the villagers have stated that the death was natural, contained in Annexure-2. He refers to report at Annexure-2, which was filed before the learned Court.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the matter is arising out of complaint case.
5. Annexure-2 is the report of the police which suggests that the death has occurred naturally. Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are brothers-in-law and petitioner no.3 is the mother-in-law of the deceased.
6. In that view of the matter, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
7. Accordingly, this application is disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 16th February, 2026 Ajay/