Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14825 (AP)

OBULAPURAM CHANDRAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1062/2026 · 2026-01-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010017832026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1062/2026 Between: 1. OBULAPURAM CHANDRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, W/O LATE SHANMUGA REDDY, R/O PUDI VILLAGE, KARUR POST, TADA MANDAL, SPSRNELLORE DISTRICT.524401 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, AMARAVATHI.522020 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR.517001 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI CITY HI-TECH POLICE STATION, SRI CITY, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517541 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRI CITY HI-TECH POLICE STATION, SRI CITY, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517541 6. THE TAHSILDAR, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517541 7. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR.517541 8. OBULAPURAM PARAMASIVA REDDY, S/O MANIKYA REDDY, AGE 60 YEAR R/O PUDI VILLAGE, KARUR POST TADA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.524401 9. B NAGARAJU NAIDU, S/6 LATE K V BALARAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS ELECTRICIAN, R/O NO 22/48, SECOND FLOOR, OPP THAMAYAHTHI APARTMENT, NEARBY NUNGAMBAKAM POLICE STATION, SOUTH MADA STREET, NUNGAMBAKAM, CHENNAI 600034 10. PALAGIRI MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, S/O PALAGIRI OBAIAH URAF OBUL REDDY, R/O D NO 153 KAPU STREET, NALLATHIMMAYYAPALLI VILLAGE, NANDALUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.516150 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent authorities in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the lands upto an extent of Ac.2.20 cents in Sy.No.332 ofThonduru Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District and further venturing to highhandedly settle the Civil Dispute at the behest of the unofficial respondents is as per se highhanded, arbitrary and illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondent authorities Nos.2 to 5 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over Ac.2.20 cents in Sy.No.332 of Thonduru Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.” 2. Sri Venkatesh B.Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, it is a case of interference of Police in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, as the matter is purely of civil nature, the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.01.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1062 of 2026 Dt.08.01.2026 Dinesh