- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9929-DB MFA No. 2972 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2972 OF 2021 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD CRESCENT COURT K M ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALURU REP BY ITS SR. DIV. MANAGER SMT. GEETHA MALLYA …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SEETHA RAMA RAO B C AND SRI. ANUP SEETHARAM RAO, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SMT. SUDHA V AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS W/O LATE PRAKASH 2. CHI. PRAJWAL P AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS S/O LATE PRAKASH 3. CHI. PRUTHVI P AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS S/O LATE PRAKASH RESPONDENT S NO.2 & 3 BEING MINORS, REP. BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9929-DB MFA No. 2972 of 2021 SMT. SUDHA V, THE FIRST RESPONDENT HEREIN 4. SMT. PRABHA @ PRABHAVATHI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O LATE SHANMUGA @ SAMBA MAISTRY ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF TARIKERE ROAD, KAIMARA VILLAGE AND POST CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK – 577 131. 5. MR. MANSOOR AHMED AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O MR. MOHAMMED AMEER R/AT GADABANAHALLI VILLAGE HOSAHALLIPET POST CHICKMAGALURU TALUK, PIN – 577 130 (DRIVER OF CITY BUS NO. KA-18/C-2696) 6. SRI. SUDESH KUMAR B N AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O. LATE B.D.NARAYANAGOWDA RESIDENT OF BESIDE JVS SCHOOL VIJAYAPURA CHIKKAMAGALR – 577 101. (OWNER OF CITY BUS NO. KA-18/C-2696) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ABHIRAJ B CHENGTI, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R4; R5 & R6 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.01.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.14/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, CHIKKAMAGALURU AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9929-DB MFA No. 2972 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) 1. The learned counsel for the appellant / United India Insurance Company has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw this appeal. 2. Considering the contents of the memo and the submissions made at the Bar, we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn. 3. The statutory amount deposited by the Insurance Company shall be transferred to the jurisdictional Tribunal for realization in favour of the claimants. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE UN, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1