APHC010015802019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 692/2019 Between: 1. NAMBARU SRINIVASARAO, S/O TIRUPATAYYA, RESIDENT OF LANKALAPALEM VILLAGE, PARWADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT OF A.P., AMARAVATHY, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PARAWADA MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with rastha/ pathway from the lands in Sy.No. 131/1A, 1B and 1C to the lands in Sy.No. 130/2A, 2B and 2C and Sy.No. 128/1 to 9 of Mantripalem Village, 2 JS,J W.P.No.692/2019 Parwada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim orders restraining the 4th respondent, his staff/officials from interfering with rastha/ pathway from the lands in Sy.No. 131/1A, 1B and 1C to the lands in Sy.No. 130/2A, 2B and 2C and Sy.No. 128/1 to 9 of Mantripalem Village, Parwada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.692/2019 The Court made the following ORDER: The writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering into the rastha/pathway in the lands in Sy.No.131/1A, 1B and 1C to the lands in Sy.No. 130/2A, 2B and 2C and Sy.No. 128/1 to 9 of Mantripalem Village, Parwada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. Perused the record. 4. Since this Court cannot go into the dispute with regard to the pathway, it is open to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum. 5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.03.2026 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.692/2019 8 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 692/2019 Dated: 02.03.2026 RSD