[2026:RJ-JP:4135] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 169/2026 1. Vijay Banjara S/o Aaidan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 6, Bagad, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). 2. Punaram S/o Sohanlal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 2, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 342/2026 Jagmohan Son Of Beerbalram, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Khemu Ki Dhani, Tehsil Chidawa, Police Station Chidawa, District Jhunjhunu ( Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Sub Jail Chidawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1108/2026 1. Ajay S/o Ghevar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Tajpur, Police Station Ateli (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). 2. Vindo Kumar S/o Bhuraram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ward No. 2, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). 3. Omprakash @ Angoor S/o Ghevarram, Aged About 21 [2026:RJ-JP:4135] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-169/2026] Years, R/o Tajpur (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Choumal Mr. Prashant Sharma Mr. P.C. Bhandari with Mr. Rakesh Chandel For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Sandeep Garssa Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 29/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.340/2025 registered with the Police Station Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(4), 119(1), 329(4), 351(2) and 303(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the allegations against the present accused-petitioners in the F.I.R. are that in the midnight, near about 100 persons came to the house of the complainant along with 3 JCB and 4 Tractor and demolished his house. Learned counsels further submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; they are in custody since 18.12.2025 and they are no more required for any kind of further investigation or recovery. They also submit [2026:RJ-JP:4135] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-169/2026] that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the bail applications. Learned counsel for the complainant states that the accused- petitioners came in the midnight and demolished the complainant’s house. He also stated that the main accused is not yet arrested. 4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and so also perused the case diary. 5. Taking into consideration the allegations against the present accused-petitioners in the F.I.R., which are general in nature and so also the nature of the house which alleged to have been demolished by the accused-petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be [2026:RJ-JP:4135] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-169/2026] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected bail application. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /95-97