Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14804 (JHR)

VISHNU ORAON v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10051/2025 · 2026-02-16

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4268 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10051 of 2025 ----- Vishnu Oraon, S/o Soma Oraon, R/o Village- Bhadgaon, P.O. Bharno, P.S. Bharno, District- Gumla/ Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. …...... 03/16.02.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 111(1), 111(2)(b), 310(2), 310(5), 308(6), 308(7), 109, 61 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, under Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. 4. Some unknown persons entered the Crusher of the informant and thereafter opened fire and one of the staff got injured. Though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., but the fact remains that the petitioner was arrested in Chandwa P.S. Case No.106 of 2025, wherein he confessed his guilt and the mobile phone which was looted in connection with this case was recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The said mobile phone was put on TIP and was identified. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.74 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar stands rejected. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 16th February, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 17/02/2026