STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. DR. ARCHANA KUMARI MEENA D/O SHRI PRABHU DAYAL MEENA
WRW/41/2019 · 2026-02-05
Inderjeet Singh
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14801 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14801 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5518] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 41/2019
1. State
Of
Rajasthan,
Through
Its
Principal Secretary,medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services Department Behind Secretariat, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
3. Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Through Its Convener Medical Officer (Dental) Recruitment Examination 2018, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302033 ----Petitioners Versus Dr. Archana Kumari Meena D/o Shri Prabhu Dayal Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Malawas, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Rajasthan) ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 9/2019
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Director, Directorate Of Medical, Health Family Welfare Services Department, Behind Secretariat, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur
3. Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Through Its Convener, Medical Officer (Dental ) Recruitment Examination 2018, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur -302033 ----Petitioners Versus Dr. Jawahar Singh Saini S/o Shri Ghanshyam Saini, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 31, Kathumar Road, Village Sonkhar Tehsil Kathumar, Via Khedli District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay, AAAG Ms. Monisha Agarwal on behalf of Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG For Respondent(s) :
[2026:RJ-JP:5518] (2 of 2) [WRW-41/2019] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 05/02/2026 As per record, PF and notices have not been filed since long. In that view of the matter, these review petitions stand dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners for revival of this order in case any difficulty arise.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J Upendra Pratap Singh /6-7