FIROZ AHMAD S/O SHRI ABDUS SALAM v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
CW/87/2026 · 2026-01-12
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14798 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14798 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1076] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 87/2026 Firoz Ahmad S/o Shri Abdus Salam, Aged About 55 Years, B- 294, Paramount Golfofreste, Zeta 1, Greater Noida, Po Container Depot, Dist Gautam Buddha Nagar- 201311. (U.p) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate Centre, State Bank Bhavan, Madam Cama Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400021.
2. Chief General Manager, State Bank Of India, Local Head Office, C Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur -302005
3. Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, Special Branch, High Court Premises, Jodhpur - 342006. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : In person through VC For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/01/2026
1. Petitioner, appeared in-person, through V.C. has contended that petitioner has joined the services of the State Bank of India in 1993 and served as an employee with the respondent-bank for approximately 24 years. It is contended that benefits of the leave encashment and provident fund amount have not been granted to the petitioner.
2. Accordingly, the petitioner has filed multiple representations starting from 16.09.2024 to 13.03.2025.
3. It is further contended that in reply to the application filed under the Right to Information Act, 2005, respondent-Bank has
[2026:RJ-JP:1076] (2 of 2) [CW-87/2026] admitted that the first internal communication for processing retiral benefits came to be issued after passage of approximately 1004 days from the cessation of service on 18.12.2017.
4. Considering the facts of the case and as per the submissions put forth by the petitioner, the appropriate authority for adjudication of the representation is respondent No.2.
5. Accordingly, this Court directs the Chief General Manager (Respondent No.2) to consider the representations filed by the petitioner or any other representation filed, within a period of 15 days from the date of passing of this order, within a period of 30 days of filing of such representation i.e. latest by 27.02.2026, strictly in accordance with law, by way of a speaking order.
6. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stands disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /22