19-CRA-1072-2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1072 OF 2010 Ravindra Rajaram Dange ...Applicant Versus Mohanrao Madanrao Bhurke ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN CRA. NO. 377 OF 2019 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1072 OF 2010 Mohan Madanrao Bhurke (Since Deceased) Thr. Legal Heirs Smt. Disha Gagan Narekar ...Applicant Versus Ravindra Dange ...Respondent _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Anway Mane a/w Chinar Sankpal i/b Prajakt Arjunwadkar, Advocate for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 1st October, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Anway Mane, learned Advocate for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent either physically or through VC mode. 2. By the present Revision Application, the Applicant has sought for the following reliefs in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) :- (a) That this Hon’ble court may be pleased to allow the present Civil Application and be further pleased to grant Arjun 1 19-CRA-1072-2010.doc permission to deposit rent in the Trial Court Satara in RCA No. 225 of 2008. (b) Any other just and equitable orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit be granted. 3. Mr. Anway Mane, learned Advocate holding for Advocate Mr. Prajakt Arjunwadkar, learned Advocate on record for the Applicant, states that despite several attempts made by Mr. Prajakt Arjunwadkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, to contact the Applicant, the Applicant is not reachable. He states that the Applicant has not contacted the office of Mr. Prajakt Arjunwadkar, for quite some time. He submits that in view of the Applicant not contacting the Advocate on record Mr. Prajakt Arjunwadkar, he has no instructions in the present matter and is unable to proceed with the matter. He therefore submits that this proceedings be disposed of. 4. On 20.08.2026, the following order was passed :- 1. This Civil Revision Application is of the year 2010. 2. When this Application was called out, neither the Applicant nor the Advocate for the Applicant was present. 3. None present for the Respondent. 4. Office note dated 14th August, 2026 reads thus: "1) CRA IS ADMITTED ON 11/01/2010. 2) NOTICE ISSUED TO RESPONDENT IS DULY SERVED. 3) R & P WRIT RECEIVED. 4) AS PER COURTS ORDER DTD. 18/03/2019 PASSED IN C. A. NO. 122/2019, ADVOCATE FOR Arjun 2 19-CRA-1072-2010.doc APPLICANT HAS CARRIED OUT AND AMENDMENT ON 25/03/2019 (LEGAL HEIR OF SOLE RESPONDENT BROUGHT ON RECORD). COURT (S.J.) FOR FINAL HEARING" 5. To afford an opportunity to the Applicant/Advocate for the Applicant to appear, list this matter on 1ª October, 2026 under the caption "For Dismissal". 5. None appears for the Respondent. 6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Anway Mane, learned Advocate holding for Mr. Prajakt Arjunwadkar, learned Advocate on record for the Applicant, this Court is left with no other alternative but to accept the same and dismiss this Revision Application for non- prosecution. 7. Civil Revision Application No. 1072 of 2010 is dismissed for non-prosecution. 8. In view of the dismissal of the present Application, nothing further survives in Civil Application in Civil Revision Application No. 377 of 2019 and the same is disposed of. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun 3 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.10.06 12:21:49 +0530