Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14794 (GAU)

M/s Barapani Enterprises v. The Union of India and 3 Ors

WP(C)/459/2025 · 2026-09-20

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040016252025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/459/2025 M/s Barapani Enterprises represented by its power of attorney holder Shri Tago Taju, Son of Late Chilli Taju, Village Lika, Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 791125 VERSUS The Union of India and 3 Ors represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt of India, Transport Bhawan, 1 Parliament Street, New Delhi, 110001 2:National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its General Manager (P) Branch Office PMU BASAR PO and PS Basar Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh 791101 3:National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its General Manager (P) Branch Office PME Likabali PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 791125 4:The Executive Director (P) Age: 0 Occupation : National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd Regional Office Division IV Page No.# 2/2 Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : Arup Bhatttacharjee, Doli Mara,G T Sangma,A R Gogoi Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, Tapan Bharali,Surendra Sahu,CGSC,KeekeLoya,DSGI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 21-09-2026 Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum/Court, as the respondents have disputed the claim of the petitioner. Mr. K. Loya, learned CGC, and Ms. A. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, NHIDCL, are present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum/Court, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant