Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14782 (RAJ)

RAMNIWAS S/O SHRI INDRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/566/2026 · 2026-02-12

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6778] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 566/2026 1. Ramniwas S/o Shri Indraj, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 2. Vasu Deo S/o Shri Daluram, Aged About 81 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 3. Kailash S/o Shri Indraj, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 4. Babulal S/o Shri Kishore, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 5. Vinod Devi W/o Shri Mahendra, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 6. Kishore S/o Shri Balu Ram, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 7. Naresh Kumar S/o Nagarmal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 8. Harji Ram S/o Shri Baluram, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 9. Gopal S/o Shri Onkarmal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu 10. Vijendra Sharma S/o Hariprasad, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 11. Shreeram S/o Girdhari, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Village Mainas Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu 12. Basudev S/o Natharam, Aged About 80 Years, R/o Village Mainass, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. 13. Jagan Singh S/o Nathuram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu 14. Sushila W/o Anand Singh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Mainas, Tehsil Nawalgargh, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To Government, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. District Collector, Jhunjhunu. [2026:RJ-JP:6778] (2 of 3) [CW-566/2026] 3. Nayab Tehsildar, Mukundgarh, Jhunjhunu. 4. Tehsildar, Nawalgargh, Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Jakhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC with Mr. Praveshika Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 12/02/2026 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners assailing the notice dated 11.11.2025 issued by the respondents under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, in case No.46/2025. As the petitioners have directly approached this Court without exhausting the remedies available to them under law, this Court is not inclined to delve into the merits of the matter. Considering the remedy available to the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that:- (i) The petitioners are required to approach the competent authority by filing reply to the notice dated 11.11.2025 along with any other documents, which they wish to file in support of their reply within a period of ten days from today i.e. 12.02.2026. (ii) The respondents shall consider the reply and take a decision thereon within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order, after granting due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order. [2026:RJ-JP:6778] (3 of 3) [CW-566/2026] (iii) The decision taken by the respondents shall be duly served upon the petitioners within a period of three days from the date of passing of such order. (iv) The respondents are restrained from taking any coercive action against the petitioners in pursuance to the notice dated 11.11.2025 and any further action in pursuance to the said decision to be taken by the respondents would be initiated only after a period of ten days from the date of receipt of service of the said decision/order upon the petitioners, enabling them to take appropriate legal remedies, if required. Needless to say that the directions issued herein are only to decide the reply/representation as submitted by the petitioners strictly in accordance with law and does not contemplate any decision to be taken in a particular manner. With the above said directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /31