Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1478 (RAJ)

SHERSINGH S/O PUKHRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4504/2026 · 2026-04-02

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13960] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4504/2026 Shersingh S/o Pukhraj, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Hodaheli, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Confined At District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.93/2007 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District-Karauli for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 336, 353, 436, 395, 397 and 452 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of PDPP Act for grant of bail in a case wherein earlier the petitioner was released on bail, however, he failed to appear before the trial Court on scheduled dates and his bail bonds was forfeited on 19.04.2018. Consequently, standing arrest warrant was issued against him. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the absence of the petitioner was neither intentional nor deliberate but due to earning livelihood, he went outside the State and could not attend [2026:RJ-JP:13960] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4504/2026] the Court on stipulated dates. The petitioner has now been arrested in pursuance of standing arrest warrant on 10.02.2026 and has remained in custody since then. Now, petitioner undertakes to appear on each and every date of hearing in future. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the explanation furnished by the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the view that the petitioner deserves one more opportunity to face the trial. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Shersingh S/o Pukhraj shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/108