CRM-M-19869- IN THE H HANSRAJ ALIA STATE OF HAR 1 The dat 2 The dat 3 The dat website 4 Whethe pronoun pronoun 5 The del judgme CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. R Mr. N **** MANISHA BATR 1. The 483 of Bharatiya of regular bail in under Sections 147 Rewari, District R -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH ALIAS HANSA ALIAS HANSRAJ Versus HARYANA he date when the judgment is reserved he date when the judgment is pronoun he date when the judgment is uploaded ebsite hether only operative part of the judg ronounced or whether the full judgmen ronounced he delay, if any, of the pronouncement dgment and reasons thereof. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Anas Ahmed, Advocate and Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate for the p Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana **** BATRA, J. The instant petition has been filed atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.24 ns 147, 149, 302, 201 and 216 of IPC trict Rewari. JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-19869-2026 (O&M) SRAJ POSWAL ... Petitioner ...Respondent served 11.05.2026 onounced 12.05.2026 loaded on the 12.05.2026 e judgment is dgment is Full cement of full Not applicable ANISHA BATRA the petitioner by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant 247 dated 30.05.2024 registered of IPC at Police Station Model Town oner ction grant tered own AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.12 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19869- 2. As pe about 3-4 AM, complainant Yash had left on the sc complainant that Sunny came back in front of the hou vehicle and sustai The wife and sist that the dead body to know that Ak Dharmendra, Raj, of Hansa Gurjar him. The complain 3. After initiated. Post-mo conducted, as per complications cau cause death in or arrested on the sam admitting his invo hatched by co-acc him to the godow and they along wi -2026 (O&M) 2 As per the allegations, on the interven AM, Akash @ Sunny, who was Yashpal, came to his house and took the scooty belonging to the complain that they were going to roam aroun back to his house along with the scoo house of the complainant told him th sustained head injury and, hence, w sister-in-law of the complainant w body of Lokesh was lying therein. O at Akash @ Sunny along with pe , Raj, Sahil, Sachin and Chirag had ta and had inflicted injuries on him mplainant, as such, prayed for taking a After registration of the FIR, inv mortem examination of the dea as per which, the cause of death was ns caused by blunt weapon, homici in ordinary course of nature. The the same day. He was interrogated and involvement in the crime and dis accused Bhola, in pursuance of w odown of Hansa Gurjar, who was alr ng with other co-accused had extend ntervening night of 29/30.05.2024, at was a friend of Lokesh, son of d took Lokesh along with him. They mplainant and had disclosed to the around. At about 7 AM, Akash @ e scooty and while parking the same him that Lokesh had fallen from the ce, was admitted at Virat Hospital. nant went to the hospital and found rein. On making inquiries, they came petitioner Hans Raj @ Hansa, had taken the victim to the godown on him with dandas, thereby killing king action in the matter. investigation proceedings were e dead body of the victim was was ante-mortem injuries and their omicidal in nature and sufficient to The accused Akash @ Sunny was ted and suffered disclosure statement disclosed that a conspiracy was of which, the victim was taken by as already inimical with the victim extended beatings to the victim with 4, at n of They o the h @ same the pital. ound came ansa, own illing were was their nt to was ment was n by ictim with AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.12 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19869- dandas and cause became unconscio Hospital. The pet subsequently. Inv 4. It is a falsely implicated victim. The case been made out to eye-witness Mohd He is in custody fo chances of conclu served by detainin petition is liable to 5. Per c keeping in view th he does not deser deserve to be allow 6. This C for the parties at co 7. The p accused Bhola an assembly with th -2026 (O&M) 3 caused injuries to him. He further d onscious, he had taken him in a tempo he petitioner was arrested on 12.06.20 Investigation now stands completed It is argued by learned counsel for t licated in this case. There is no eye e case rests upon circumstantial evide out to connect him with the commissio hd. Aarif, Mohd. Murshid and Jak tody for a period of over about 01 year conclusion of trial in the near future. etaining him in custody anymore. It able to be dismissed. Per contra, learned State counsel iew the gravity of the allegations as t deserve to be extended benefit of b e allowed. This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. The petitioner is alleged to have hatc ola and Akash @ Sunny by forming ith the co-accused and in prosecutio rther disclosed that after the victim tempo and left him in front of Virat .06.2024. Co-accused were arrested pleted. l for the petitioner that he has been o eye-witness to the murder of the l evidence and no circumstance has mission of the subject offence. The nd Jakir Hussain have turned hostile. 1 year and 11 months. There are no uture. No useful purpose would be re. It is, therefore, argued that the unsel has vehemently argued that ns as levelled against the petitioner, it of bail and the petition does not ubmissions made by learned counsel e hatched a conspiracy with the co- orming membership of an unlawful secution of common object of that ictim Virat ested been f the has The stile. re no ld be t the that oner, s not unsel - wful that AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.12 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19869- unlawful assembly to have caused inj for the petitioner Mohd. Aarif, PW these witnesses ha per which they ha yet to be examine nature. His active on account of ho considered to have are also not clean cases. The petiti consideration the quantum of sente considered opinio Accordingly the sa 8. It is, be construed as an and shall not influ 9. Since any, is rendered in 12.05.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 4 sembly, he is alleged to have opened a sed injuries to him leading to his hom tioner has placed on record copies o if, PW2-Mohd. Murshid and PW3-Ja ses had turned hostile and did not sup ey had eye-witnessed the occurrence. amined. The allegations against the active complicity in the crime stands of hostile depositions of the above to have become entitled to seek conce clean since as per the custody certific petition of co-accused Akash has also n the above discussed facts, the natu sentence which the conviction may opinion that the petition does the same is dismissed. It is, however, clarified that the obse d as an expression of opinion of this C t influence the outcome of the trial in a Since the main petition has been dism ered infructuous. (MAN Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No ened an assault upon the victim and is homicidal death. Learned counsel pies of sworn depositions of PW1- Jakir Hussain showing that all ot support the prosecution version as rrence. However, the complainant is st the petitioner are quite serious in tands prima facie established. Only above-named PWs, he cannot be concession of bail. His antecedents ertificate, he is involved in 06 other as also been dismissed. Taking into e nature of the accusations and the n may entail, this Court is of the oes not deserve to be allowed. e observations made above shall not this Court on the merits of the case ial in any manner.
dismissed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No and unsel - t all on as nt is us in ly t be dents other into the f the wed. l not case n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.12 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.